Founder control and equity dilution: what to consider before signing

This is commercial commentary, not legal advice. The only control a founder has is the control the documents give them. A website cannot add to that.

Founders often talk about control as if it were the same thing as owning most of the shares. It is not. You can hold a majority of the economic rights and still be unable to hire, borrow, issue shares or sell the company without someone else’s consent. You can also hold a minority of the economics and keep day-to-day management, if that is what the agreements say. Before signing, separate the two questions and answer each from the draft in front of you.

Economic ownership

Economic ownership is the right to share in value: dividends, sale proceeds, and what is left if the company is wound up. Dilution is what happens to that share when new shares are issued. A founder who owns 80 per cent today does not own 80 per cent of every future outcome unless the documents restrict further issues, or give them a right to participate. Ask what happens on the next financing, on an option pool, and on the shares that have not vested yet.

A services-for-equity partner’s percentage should be read the same way. The number is meaningless until you know whether it is of the company today, of a fully diluted company, or of a class with different rights. Pixelette does not publish a standard equity percentage for Hybrid Sweat Equity for this reason.

Decision-making rights

Day-to-day management usually sits with the directors. Shareholders decide the matters reserved to them by the Companies Act 2006 and by the articles and any shareholders’ agreement. Section 284 sets a general rule that, on a poll, voting rights follow the shares unless the articles say otherwise. The articles, and a shareholders’ agreement, often do say otherwise. Reserved matters are a contractual list: the decisions that cannot be taken alone. Read that list as carefully as the cap table. A long list of reserved matters is a real limit on control, even when the founder is still the largest shareholder.

Vesting, leavers and exits

Vesting is a timetable, usually contractual, for earning shares or the right to keep them. It is not an automatic feature of English company law. If equity is said to be “earned against delivery”, the draft should say what delivery means, who accepts it, and what happens to the unearned portion if the relationship ends. Leaver provisions decide whether someone who stops work keeps, sells or forfeits shares. Those clauses vary widely. Do not assume a fair outcome is implied.

Exit clauses cover drag, tag, and who can force or block a sale. They matter more on the day a buyer appears than they do in the first workshop. If you cannot explain them in plain language, you are not ready to sign them.

What to take into a negotiation

A one-page description of who decides the product, the hiring and the spend.
The cash and equity mix you can actually live with, not the mix that sounds lightest.
A milestone you could accept or reject without an argument about taste.
A question list for counsel on vesting, leavers, reserved matters and future issues.

Nothing here guarantees that a founder will retain control, or that dilution will stay inside a stated band. Those are outcomes of the signed documents and of later financings. The companion article on how partnerships can be structured covers the commercial side. Founders who want to discuss a specific venture can explore a partnership.

References

Continue

If the questions in this article match a venture you are building, the next step is a conversation, not a commitment.